Police Killed in Kenya as Country Lines Up To Vote

Kenya’s Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyattai

As Kenyans began lining up to vote today in an important election for the country’s leadership after the creation of a new constitution, there were reports of brutal election-related deaths, including police officers, in several pockets of the nation—but nothing like the violence during the disputed election in 2007 that killed more than 1,200 people.

An estimated 100,000 police officers are being deployed in an election where 14 million are expected to vote.

The violence occurred in the coastal city of Mombasa and in Kilifi. In Mombasa, a machete-wielding gang ambushed police officers who were deployed to keep peace, killing four of them before the opening of polling stations.

“Our officers who were on night patrol were attacked by a gang of youths wielding machetes and as a result four of the officers were killed. Two among the dead are senior officers who were overseeing the patrol,” said Ambrose Munyasia, chief of police intelligence in the Coast area.

According to Al Jazeera, 13 people were killed in Mombasa, including six police. Sources say it was the work of the Mombasa Republican Council, a secessionist group on Kenya’s coast. But Al Jazeera reporter Peter Greste said it would be a mistake to extrapolate the Mombasa violence to the rest of the country.

This is “a very volatile situation on the coast. Mombasa is a very, very specific situation,” he said.

In Kilifi, another gang assaulted security forces at a school being used as a voting center, killing at least four officers.

In some places, voters have been waiting for more than six hours to cast ballots for president, senators, members of parliament, county governors and representatives to the newly formed county assembly.

Festus Mogae, former president of Botswana who is leading the team of observers for the election, told Al Jazeera he is so far “impressed” by the number of people turning out to vote.

“All I see is enthusiasm,” Mogae said from Nairobi.

Last month, the International Criminal Court ruled that although one of the main candidates, Uhuru Kenyatta, is facing trial in April before the court for crimes against humanity, he can still run for president. The ruling by the ICC not to interfere with Kenya’s election meant that the people of Kenya are free to cast a ballot for a candidate who may be convicted, along with his running mate William Ruto, of orchestrating clashes in the ethnic violence that erupted after disputed elections in 2007. That violence resulted in more than 1,100 deaths and caused 350,000 others to flee their homes. It also slowed the growth of East Africa’s largest economy.

Both Kenyatta, the son of Kenya’s founding president, and Ruto deny any wrongdoing.

According to Kenyan opinion polls, Kenyatta, the deputy prime minister, was running close behind Prime Minister Raila Odinga.

On the eve of the election, Mwai Kibaki, the outgoing president, appealed for a peaceful vote.

“I also make a passionate plea for all of us to vote peacefully. Indeed, peace is a cornerstone of our development,” Kibaki, who is barred from seeking a third five-year term, said to his countrymen in a televised address before polling day.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top