Elmo Accuser Has Long Arrest Record Including Armed Robbery

The man who allegedly had sex with Elmo puppeteer Kevin Clash when he was 16 has been revealed to have a history of run-ins with the law, including arrests for armed robbery, reckless driving and fraudulent checks. Sheldon Stephens, 24, is an aspiring model, and retracted his allegations against Clash on Tuesday, just a day after they became public. Details of how Stephens and Clash became involved have not yet been revealed, but Clash was forced to take a leave of absence from Sesame Street.

According to The Smoking Gun, Stephens was arrested for robbing his former boss at knife point for $250,000 in jewelry in 2009, the most serious in a series of offenses. After being fired from his internship in Los Angeles, he robbed Darian Pollard and boarded a flight back to his hometown of Harrisburg, PA, where police were waiting for him.

TMZ had previously reported that the Harrisburg law firm representing Stephens was negotiating a six figure settlement with Clash. Instead, Andreozzi & Associates revealed that they were no longer representing Stephens, and that “his sexual relationship with Mr. Clash was an adult consensual relationship.”

Still, the allegations may have cost Clash his job, and made his sexuality a public matter. Stephens may have similarly damaged his own aspirations as an actor and model, which are detailed on his Facebook page.

“I like to consider myself a rare breed. I’m very spontaneous and random…I’m determined and goal oriented,” his bio reads. “My destiny is laid on a solid gold brick pathway……. MY FUTURE IS BRIGHT and never will it dim.”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top