8 Examples of How the International Criminal Court Unfairly Targets Africa While Ignoring Atrocities Caused by Some Western Nations

via warisacrime.org

via warisacrime.org

Punishing African Genocides While Disregarding European Ethnic Killings

Last year, the ICC accused Omar Hassan Ahmad al Bashir, the president of Sudan, of committing 10 counts of genocide. The death toll in Darfur has been estimated to be 300,000. And, while this is an unfortunate situation, the ICC has hesitated to address war crimes associated with the United Kingdom. British troops committed war crimes during the invasion of Iraq. In fact, the Iraq Body Count project declared that British forces killed roughly 11,000 innocent civilians over the course of five years.

ICC Trial

Over-Criminalizing Africans While Under-Criminalizing Europeans

African countries make up nearly 25 percent of the ICC. Yet, according to Mohammad Baseer, a writer for africanholocaust.net, of all the individuals who have been prosecuted ICC, 90 percent of them have been African. This statistic is the very reason behind the African Union’s attack of the ICC. The African members of the AU are not necessarily against the prosecution of African leaders; they are rather against the essential exemption of global European crimes. Furthermore, while African leaders and politicians have voiced their concerns, Hailemariam Desalegn, the prime minister of Ethiopia, has expressed that the ICC has completely disregarded them.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top