Georgia Tech Study: Most Twitter Jargon Evolved From Black Slang

Twitter jargon was found to evolve from African-American slang a new study showed this week.

Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta found that much of the English shorthand used on Twitter stems from urban African-American populations in the US.

Study author Jacob Eisenstein and his team looked at 40 million Twitter messages by about 400,000 people between June 2009 and May 2011.

The complex analysis saw the team map the messages and determine how each urban center influences another, said BBC.

The authors created a map that allows one to see the influence of phrases, shorthand and expressions; spreading from one place to another.

ANI reported that the map showed the origins of numerous Twitter short-forms.

The majority of which stemmed from urban centers with large African-American populations.

More from GlobalPost: Azerbaijan’s president launches Twitter rant against Armenia

For instance, they found that the word “bruh,” which is brother, was developed in the southeastern US cities and then moved to Los Angeles.

Cleveland invented “ctfu,” or “cracking the f*** up,” which then moved eastward.

The researchers also found that cities that are ethnically and economically similar loan words to each other no matter how far the geographical distance, said the New Scientist.

The unpublished study may help further the understanding as to whether social media is driving the evolution of language and whether that evolution has recently sped up.

Source: Global Post

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top