They Want to Make 'Family Circus' and 'Heathcliff' Movies

 

A whole new generation of children can now think that Heathcliff is a ripoff of Garfield, as Waterman Entertainment has scooped up the movie and television rights to George Gately’s venerable newspaper comic strip.* They plan to make a CG/live action hybrid film, as well as a television series. That’s oldish news (“old,” as in, “from Wednesday”), but it pairs nicely with a more recent development: Fox and Walden Studios are moving forward on their own Sunday funnies film adaptation: Family Circus. They’ve hired Nicole Millard and Kathryn Price to write the film. The studios made a seven-figure (!) deal for the rights to Bil Keane’s comic back in 2010, but haven’t had much forward momentum on the project until now.

I generally roll my eyes at any wailings over the “death of creativity” in Hollywood, but this news… it stirs that reaction in my gut, at least. They aren’t really tarnishing any sacred properties here, though; this won’t be the first time either of these strips has been brought to the screen. There have been two Heathcliff TV shows and three Family Circus TV specials. Presumably, these new films will continue the tradition of offensively inoffensive blandness that these comics have carried on for decades.

*And another random discovery in that article: Waterman also has the rights for a Mr. Ed movie. I don’t even know what to say about that.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top