Apple Still Not The Most Valuable Company in the World

Patent litigator Apple, despite feverish fanboi reports, has not become the most valuable company in the world, as its market capitalisation of $623.5bn is still eclipsed by that of Petrochina.

Apple’s fans regularly trot out the firm’s market capitalisation, which is the value of a single share multiplied by the number of shares available. Yesterday Apple’s stock finished at an all-time high of $665.15, resulting in a market capitalisation value of $665.15bn, which some fanbois incorrectly claimed made it the most valuable company in the world.

In present day trading and thus ignoring inflation, Apple’s marketcapitalisation doesn’t top the charts, with Petrochina, a company traded in New York, Hong Kong and Shanghai worth $722bn.

Apple’s present market capitalisation might have taken it beyond Microsoft’s 1999 value during the dot-com bubble, though that doesn’t account for inflation, which would put Microsoft ahead by a good two hundred billion or so. Accounting for inflation, it is IBM that takes the honour of having the highest historical market capitalisation, with its 1967 share price resulting in a market capitalisation – adjusted for inflation – of $1.3tn, double that of Apple.

Apple’s blinkered fanbois might like to quote its market capitalisation because it is a large, impressive-sounding number, but in reality it says very little about a company unless it is trying to find a buyer. Given that Apple isn’t for sale, the cost of buying up all the shares outstanding today is a moot point and the fact that many commentators refer to Microsoft’s dot-com inflated market value is a sign that Apple’s value is similarly inflated.

Nevertheless, as Apple is revving up to launch the Iphone 5 and with strong rumours that Apple will introduce a smaller Ipad, its stock price and market capitalisation might remain high…

Read more: The Inquirer

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top