Nivea Apologizes For 'Offensive And Inappropriate' Re-Civilize Ad

Update-Swiss based cosmetic giant Nivea has issued an official apology for their ‘Re-Civilize’ Men’s ad. Yesterday Nivea came under fire for it’s new ad attempting to re-civilize black men.

The add features a neatly dressed, clean shaven, Black male gripping an afro-clad and heavily bearded dismembered head of his former self. The male leans back in a presumable throwing motion with a caption reading;

“Look like you give a damn…Re-Civilize yourself”.

Hmmm…really?

Nivea is clearly pushing the envelope with this one by highlighting the assumption that an afro-wearing, bearded black male is somewhat less “civilized” than his shaven, sweater dressed counterpart.

According to Forbes.com, Twitter followers are already voicing their disdain by posting the following tweets;

“Nivea says to “re-civilize” yourself. Welp. Get rid of the whole bottle of lotion.”

And…

“I bet Nivea is furiously writing an apology right now.”

And that they need, the parent company Beiersdorf issued this apology through Adweek,

“We are deeply sorry for a recent ‘Re-civilized’ Nivea For Men ad. This ad was inappropriate and offensive. Diversity and equal opportunity are crucial values at Beiersdorf and we do not tolerate insensitivity. It was never our intention to offend anyone and for this we are deeply sorry. This ad will never be used again. Beiersdorf, as a company, represents diversity, tolerance and equal opportunity. Direct and indirect discrimination must be ruled out in all decisions and in all areas of the company.”

What do you think of Nivea’s apology?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top